The term “superorganic” was probably first used by the early sociologist Herbert of the time, Alfred Kroeber and Edward Sapir, in the American Anthropologist. The idea of “The superorganic” is associated with Alfred Kroeber, an American anthropologist writing in the first half of the twentieth century. Why the Superorganic Concept Serves the Human Sciences Badly. Peter J. Richerson University of California – Los Angeles. Los Angeles . Dobzhansky’s usage was probably inspired Kroeber and kindred influential social. scientists of his.
|Published (Last):||18 December 2011|
|PDF File Size:||5.34 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
It may have a life of its own, but its life more resembles an amoeba than a human.
All living things, plants and animals, are built up of inorganic elements, mainly hydrogen, oxygen and carbon, plus some trace elements. If you copy text from this site, please acknowledge the author s and link it back to cec.
Humans have thoughts and behaviour. Do not think of a dog as a carbon superorgancio or a hydrocarbon molecule. Key Words Modules Sociology: Those are carried by individuals. There is a parallel, therefore, in the relations between the inorganic and the organic, as between the organic and the superorganic.
The arrangement makes them alive. Human beings are animals, and as such are organic systems. If you analyse all those parts, in themselves, or even as a collection, they are not living. Similarly, do not think of a community, an institution, a society as a human being. This elaboration links humans supedorganico into communities and societies.
If you separate the dog or tree into its separate elements, it dies. We can call this the lowest level of complexity. It operates at a higher level of complexity than the organic.
Similarly, the dog, if seen as a biological system, operates at a higher complexity than the inorganic elements which comprise it. Auperorganico the dynamics of how carbon atoms operate, or that combining hydrogen and oxygen can result in a rapid combustion if not an explosion, does not explain how the tree works, with its leaves converting sunlight into energy to change water and carbon sueprorganico into oxygen and carbon, channels to transfer sap from leaves to root, and so on.
The links are symbolic, not genetic as in biological systems. Looking at the kroebeer between living things and their inorganic components in this way helps us to understand the relationship between culture and persons. The second level of complexity is composed of living things.
The superorganic is another way of describing —— and understanding —— culture or the socio-cultural system. A living supeorganico transcends its inorganic parts.
They behave, however, in concert with each other, as a system external to individuals —— society. The socio-cultural level, culture or society, therefore is carried by humans and transcends humans.
They have developed communications between themselves to an elaborate degree, much more sophisticated than other animals. Culture and society comprise the third level.
Superoranico we start with the inorganic, it is the physical universe, all the atoms of elements without life. Do not anthropomorphise culture.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.